Attachment B
Tasmanian Forests Intergovernmental Agreement Contractors Voluntary Exit Grants Program
Rationale for the recommendations of the review
Review decision on applicant’s merit criteria ranking
Program guidelines that includes details of eligibility and merit criteria.
The Advisory Panel ranked the application by [Company Name] at xxx on the basis of the weighted scores used to determine applicant’s ranking against each merit criteria as detailed in the program guidelines.
In response to the written complaint received from the [Company Name] on [date], the application was referred to a review officer for further investigation.
Details of the Advisory Panel’s and reviewer’s findings are in Attachment B.1.
Reviewer’s recommendation on merit criteria ranking:
Based on the information reviewed in accordance with the merit criteria set out in the IGACEP Grant Program Guidelines:
|
No |
Reviewer’s Recommendation |
Yes/No |
Reasons/comments |
Reviewer’s initial & date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
Uphold the decision of the Advisory Panel |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Change the decision of the Advisory Panel based on the findings for x, x and x criteria |
|
|
|
|
3 |
Send the matter back to the Advisory Panel for further investigation |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Send the matter to another officer for further investigation |
|
|
|
Assistant Secretary’s decision on merit criteria ranking:
Based on the information reviewed in accordance with the merit criteria set out in the IGACEP Grant Program Guidelines:
|
No |
Assistant Secretary’s decision |
Yes/No |
Reasons/comments |
Asst Sec’s initial&date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
Uphold the decision of the Advisory Panel |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Change the decision of the Advisory Panel based on the findings for x, x and x criteria |
|
|
|
|
3 |
Send the matter back to the Advisory Panel for further investigation |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Send the matter to another officer for further investigation |
|
|
|
Assessment report – Ranking
|
Criteria |
Applicant statement/claim |
Advisory Panel finding |
Reviewer’s finding |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
(example) X stated that score for this criterion should be: |
Did get a score of xx on the basis that:
|
On the basis of the information presented to the reviewer, I agree with/do not agree with the panel’s assessment against this criterion. I found that x get a score of xx for this criterion on the basis that:
|
|
2 |
example) X stated that score for this criterion should be: |
Did get a score of xx on the basis that:
|
On the basis of the information presented to the reviewer, I agree with/do not agree with the panel’s assessment against this criterion. I found that x get a score of xx for this criterion on the basis that:
|
|
3 |
example) X stated that score for this criterion should be: |
Did get a score of xx on the basis that:
|
On the basis of the information presented to the reviewer, I agree with/do not agree with the panel’s assessment against this criterion. I found that x get a score of xx for this criterion on the basis that:
|