Tasmanian Forests Intergovernmental Agreement Contractors Voluntary Exit Grants Program
Rationale for the recommendations of the review
Review decision on the applicant’s eligibility criteria
Program guidelines that includes details of eligibility and merit criteria.
The Advisory Panel deemed the application by [Company Name] as ineligible for Tasmanian Forests Intergovernmental Agreement Contractors Voluntary Exit Grants Program (IGACEP) on the basis that it has failed to provide adequate information in order to be assessed as eligible against [A,B,C,D,E and F] of the program’s eligibility criteria.
In response to the written complaint received from the [Company Name] on [date], the application was referred to a review officer for further investigation.
Details of the Advisory Panel’s and reviewer’s findings are in Attachment A.1.
Reviewer’s recommendation on eligibility criteria:
Based on the information reviewed in accordance with the eligibility criteria set out in the IGACEP Grant Program Guidelines:
|
No |
Reviewer’s recommendation |
Yes/No |
Reasons/comments |
Reviewer’s initial & date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
Uphold the decision of the Advisory Panel |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Change the decision of the Advisory Panel based on the findings for x, x and x criteria |
|
|
|
|
3 |
Send the matter back to the Advisory Panel for further investigation |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Send the matter to another officer for further investigation |
|
|
|
Assistant Secretary’s decision on eligibility criteria:
Based on the information reviewed in accordance with the eligibility criteria set out in the IGACEP Grant Program Guidelines:
|
No |
Assistant Secretary’s decision |
Yes/No |
Reasons/comments |
Asst Sec’s initial & date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
Uphold the decision of the Advisory Panel |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Change the decision of the Advisory Panel based on the findings for x, x and x criteria |
|
|
|
|
3 |
Send the matter back to the Advisory Panel for further investigation |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Send the matter to another officer for further investigation |
|
|
|
Assessment report – Eligibility criteria
|
Criteria |
Applicant statement/claim |
Advisory Panel finding |
Reviewer’s finding |
|---|---|---|---|
|
a |
(example) X stated that it met this criterion
|
(example) x met/ did not meet this criterion on the basis that:
|
On the basis of the information presented to the reviewer, I agree with/do not agree with the panel’s assessment against this criterion. I found that x met/did not meet this criterion on the basis that: (deal with specific claims here as well)
|
|
b |
(example) X stated that it met this criterion |
(example) x met/ did not meet this criterion on the basis that:
|
On the basis of the information presented to the reviewer, I agree with/do not agree with the panel’s assessment against this criterion. I found that x met/did not meet this criterion on the basis that:
|
|
c |
(example) X stated that it met this criterion |
(example) x met/ did not meet this criterion on the basis that:
|
On the basis of the information presented to the reviewer, I agree with/do not agree with the panel’s assessment against this criterion. I found that x met/did not meet this criterion on the basis that:
|
|
d |
(example) X stated that it met this criterion |
(example) x met/ did not meet this criterion on the basis that:
|
On the basis of the information presented to the panel, I agree with/do not agree with the panel’s assessment against this criterion. I found that x met/did not meet this criterion on the basis that:
|
|
e |
(example) X stated that it met this criterion
|
(example) x met/ did not meet this criterion on the basis that:
|
On the basis of the information presented to the panel, I agree with/do not agree with the panel’s assessment against this criterion. I found that x met/did not meet this criterion on the basis that:
|
|
f |
(example) X stated that it met this criterion |
(example) x met/ did not meet this criterion on the basis that:
|
On the basis of the information presented to the panel, I agree with/do not agree with the panel’s assessment against this criterion. I found that x met/did not meet this criterion on the basis that:
|