A review of the biosecurity import requirements for fresh longan fruit from Vietnam
We are conducting a review of biosecurity import requirements for fresh longan fruit (Dimocarpus longan) from Vietnam.
We will conduct the risk analysis in three key steps:
- Announce the commencement of the risk analysis, on 14 March 2018, via
Biosecurity Advice 2018-03 and the
Announcement Information Paper.
- Conduct an assessment of pests of biosecurity concern associated with longans from Vietnam, and release the draft report on 10 December 2018, via
Biosecurity Advice 2018-31. The draft report will be released for an extended 75 calendar day public consultation period, from the standard 60 days, due to the Christmas/New Year holiday period, closing on 25 February 2019.
- Release the final risk analysis report around mid-2019, following consideration of stakeholder comments.
A summary of the risk analysis background and process is available in the
Purpose of the risk analysis
We initiated this risk analysis in response to a market access request for the import of fresh longan fruit from Vietnam. L ongan fruit is Vietnam’s highest horticultural priority for new market access.
Australia (as a World Trade Organization (WTO) member) must meet its international obligations by assessing market access requests (import proposals) and developing the least trade restrictive and scientifically justified import conditions where required. Our trading partners use the same principles when assessing Australian market access requests.
Summary of the draft report
The draft report proposes that imports of fresh longan fruit from all commercial production areas in Vietnam be permitted, subject to a range of biosecurity requirements.
The draft report identifies 11 quarantine pests and two regulated articles (thrips) associated with longans from Vietnam that require risk management measures, in combination with operation systems, to achieve Australia’s appropriate level of protection:
- Quarantine pests: guava fruit fly(Bactrocera correcta ), oriental fruit fly (
Bactrocera dorsalis ), melon fly(Zeugodacus cucurbitae ), litchi fruit borer(Conopomorpha sinensis ), grey pineapple mealybug(Dysmicoccus neobrevipes ), cocoa mealybug(Exallomochlus hispidus ), litchi mealybug(Planococcus litchi ), Pacific mealybug(Planococcus minor ), coffee mealybug(Planococcus lilacinus ), intercepted mealybug(Paracoccus interceptus ) and citriculus mealybug (Pseudococcus cryptus)
- Regulated articles: chilli thrips (
Scirtothrips dorsalis ) and onion thrips(Thrips tabaci ). These thrips are regulated articles because they can carry and spread emerging orthotospoviruses, which are quarantine pests for Australia.
The proposed risk management measures include:
- area freedom or fruit treatment (such as irradiation or cold disinfestation treatment) for fruit flies
- consignment freedom verified by pre-export visual inspection and, if found, remedial action for mealybugs and thrips
- area freedom, fruit treatment (such as irradiation or cold disinfestation treatment) or a systems approach for litchi fruit borer.
Upon finalising this policy, Vietnam must be able to demonstrate to the department that processes and procedures are in place to implement the agreed risk management measures. This will ensure safe trade in fresh longans from Vietnam. Import conditions can then be published on the department’s biosecurity import conditions (BICON) database.
Download the draft report
If you have difficulty accessing these files, visit
web accessibility for help.
Make a submission
We invite you to submit written comments on the draft report during the extended 75 calendar day public consultation period. Your feedback will be considered in preparing the final report.
We extended the consultation period to 75 calendar days, from the standard 60 days, due to the Christmas/New Year holiday period.
The extended consultation period will close on 25 February 2019.
Register as a stakeholder
We use the stakeholder register for distributing biosecurity risk analysis policy information. Stakeholders interested in receiving information and updates on biosecurity risk analyses are invited to subscribe via the department’s online
subscription service. By subscribing to
Biosecurity Risk Analysis Plant, you will receive Biosecurity Advices and other notifications relating to plant biosecurity policy.
Protecting Australia from exotic pests
Australia is free from many of the world’s most damaging plant pests. Exotic plant pests are capable of damaging our natural environment, destroying our food production and agriculture industries, and some could change our way of life. Australia’s biosecurity system, which includes the risk assessment process, helps protect us from exotic plant pests.
We undertake risk assessments of pests and identify risk management options to address any risks posed by these exotic pests. These measures reflect Australia’s overall approach to the management of biosecurity risk.
Zero risk is impossible. Aiming for zero risk would mean no tourists, no international travel and no imports of any commodities. Australia invests heavily in biosecurity to ensure risks are managed.
Australia exports almost two-thirds of its agricultural produce. The future of our agricultural and food industries, including their capacity to contribute to growth and jobs, depends on Australia’s capacity to maintain its animal and plant health status.
Australia accepts imports only when we are confident the risks of pests and diseases can be managed to achieve an appropriate level of protection for Australia.
All World Trade Organization (WTO) members are signatories to the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (the SPS Agreement), under which they have both rights and obligations.
The basic obligations of the SPS Agreement are that SPS measures must:
- be based on a risk assessment appropriate to the circumstances or drawn from standards developed by the World Organisation for Animal Health and the International Plant Protection Convention
- only be applied to the extent necessary to protect human, animal or plant life or health
- be based on science
- not arbitrarily or unjustifiably discriminate between WTO members, or be a disguised restriction on trade.
Under the SPS Agreement, each WTO Member is entitled to maintain a level of protection it considers appropriate to protect human, animal or plant life or health within its territory – in other words, its appropriate level of protection.
Appropriate level of protection
The appropriate level of protection (ALOP) for Australia is defined in the
Biosecurity Act 2015 as ‘a high level of sanitary and phytosanitary protection aimed at reducing biosecurity risks to very low, but not to zero’. This definition was agreed with all our state and territory governments and recognises that a zero-risk stance is impractical.
The ALOP is a broad objective, and risk management measures are established to achieve that objective.
Read more about Australia’s ALOP
The term ‘biosecurity risk’ is used to describe the combination of the likelihood and the consequences of a pest or disease of biosecurity concern entering, establishing and spreading in Australia.
Australia's biosecurity system protects our unique environment and agricultural sector and supports our reputation as a safe and reliable trading nation. This has significant economic, environmental and community benefits for all Australians.
New scientific information
Scientific information can be provided to us at any time, including after a risk analysis has been completed. We will consider the information provided and review the analysis.
Meeting Australia’s food standards
Imported food for human consumption must satisfy Australia’s food standards. Australian law requires that all food, including imported fresh fruit, meets the standards set out in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code and the requirements of the
Imported Food Control Act 1992. Each state and territory also has its own food laws that must be met.
Food Standards Australia and New Zealand (FSANZ) is responsible for developing and maintaining the Food Standards Code. The standards apply to all food in Australia, irrespective of whether it is grown domestically or imported.
Timing of imports
Following the consideration of stakeholder comments, a final report is released. The final report reflects the completion of the risk analysis. Before imports can commence, we:
- verify that a country can action the recommended risk management measures
- publish import conditions on the Biosecurity Import Conditions system (BICON)
- issue import permits for trade to commence.
The decision to import agricultural produce to Australia is a commercial decision between an importer in Australia and a supplier in the exporting country who can meet the import conditions.
For more information, stakeholders can email
imports or phone 1800 900 090 (option 1, option 1).